Is Pope Francis Trying to Revive John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body”?

Has Pope Francis revived Pope John Paul II’s controversial “Theology of the Body” approach to sexual ethics? In an article for Commonweal, Paul Moses examined Pope Francis’ recent decision to revive that project. Moses noted the following development:

“On September 19, Pope Francis announced [his] decision… he will revamp the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family. The pope is re-affirming the Theology of the Body, but beginning a process of responding to some of the questions that have been raised about it. I see it as an effort to better connect John Paul’s ethereal talks to the realities of everyday life, in which we all wrestle with conscience and circumstance.”

The Theology of the Body is a series of teachings by Pope John Paul II that were delivered by the Pope in 129 audiences between 1979 to 1984. The teachings specifically address human sexuality and range from teachings about Genesis and the Creation story to the sacrament of marriage.

Pope Francis, while agreeing with and affirming the general notion of Theology of the Body, wishes to broaden the focus of the discussion. The pope is quoted as saying:

“We must be informed and impassioned interpreters of the wisdom of faith in a context in which individuals are less well supported than in the past by social structures, and in their emotional and family life. With the clear purpose of remaining faithful to the teaching of Christ, we must therefore look, with the intellect of love and with wise realism, at the reality of the family today in all its complexity, with its lights and its shadows.”

Francis has appointed Monsignor Pierangelo Sequeri to run what was formerly the Pontifical Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family, which will now be called the Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Matrimonial and Family Science. The pope’s main concern is that the Church’s theological concepts of the body remain too “abstract.” In Amoris Laetitia, the pope says:

“We have long thought that simply by stressing doctrinal, bioethical and moral issues, without encouraging openness to grace, we were providing sufficient support to families, strengthening the marriage bond and giving meaning to marital life. We find it difficult to present marriage more as a dynamic path to personal development and fulfillment than as a lifelong burden. We also find it hard to make room for the consciences of the faithful, who very often respond as best they can to the Gospel amid their limitations, and are capable of carrying out their own discernment in complex situations. We have been called to form consciences, not to replace them.”

In summary, the pope would like to see a greater emphasis on the reality, in all its messiness, of marriage and sexuality. Abstract concepts are often not helpful in the context of real-life relationships. That is why he calls us to trust the role of conscience in people’s lives.

Conscience is quite an interesting connection for the pope to make here. For many LGBTQ Catholics, conscience is a crucial aspect of moral theology when it comes to maintaining a healthy spiritual life. When faced with the question of how one could justify being an LGBTQ Catholic, a potential answer could the that the moral justification comes with an informed conscience.

With this shift in focus from abstract ideas to affirming the messiness of concrete reality, perhaps the “revamp” of this institute will make space for the consciences of the LGBTQ Catholics who are usually excluded from conversations around Theology of the Body. For instance, the Theology of the Body’s notion of mandatory “chastity” for non-heterosexual people has harmed many LGBTQ Catholics: the call to be “chaste” looks more like a call to “not be,” as theologian James Alison puts it.

We need to be asking more questions about the reality of LGBTQ people. When “chastity” hits the ground, will it actually do more harm to our Catholic LGBTQ siblings than good?

Perhaps Francis’ call to put more trust in the consciences of married people could also extend to LGBTQ people, who are just as “capable of carrying out their own discernment in complex situations.”

Lizzie Sextro, New Ways Ministry, October 26, 2017

4 replies
  1. Martin
    Martin says:

    I’m surprised that Lizzy Sextro focuses only on Monsignor Pierangelo Sequeri and not the appointment of Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia as Grand Chancellor of the Matrimonial & Family Sciences Institute. She seems to imply that there is a degree of uncertainty about reviving JPII’s “Theology of the Body” model. For once conservative Catholic commentators have got it right – there will be no reversion to a faulty interpretation of JPII’s thought on this such as that promoted by the likes of George Weigel. Those close to JPII note how misinterpreted has been his original “Theology of the Body” by those who seek to mold it into a robust ideology rather than a personalist inspired theological reflection. Edward Pentin writes in the National Catholic Register: “Msgr. Sequeri is known to take a similar line on marriage and family issues as Archbishop Paglia, and on behalf of the pontifical council, chaired a roundtable discussion on the Synod on the Family, hosted by the Jesuit publication, La Civilta Cattolica. Given the willingness of both Archbishop Paglia and Msgr. Sequeri to entertain views and pastoral practices which critics say would contradict the moral clarity of traditional Church approaches to these issues, some are concerned by their appointments to such key roles related to life, marriage and family, and the changes they might enact. That concern is no less keenly felt than at the John Paul II Institute where one Vatican official described the appointments as a “diminishment” of its work. They also come on the heels of the Synods on the Family when the teaching of Pope St. John Paul II on marriage and the family was sidelined by the synod’s organizers, particularly during the first meeting in October 2014. It is not clear yet what Archbishop Paglia will do as grand chancellor — usually the role is honorary, but observers say he is expected to take a more active lead.”
    I hope that LGBT Catholics will not fall into a false analysis of current and future developments in this regard.

      DON E SIEGAL says:

      “Is Pope Francis Trying to Revive John Paul II’s “Theology of the Body?”

      “I hope that LGBT Catholics will not fall into a false analysis of current and future developments in this regard.”

      Martin, thank you for your insightful comment. When I first read this post on Bondings 2.0, I was drawn to the conclusion you advised LGBT Catholics not to take. My initial impression to the post, was, oh no, here we go again. I wanted to respond, but I didn’t know how to start.

      Let us all hope and pray that what you have written may come to pass.

  2. Jim Wysocki
    Jim Wysocki says:

    Absolutely he is, Francis, like JPII is following the movement of thx Spirit on these important issues the Church has been dealing with under old concepts and doctrines for too many centuries. Time to listen and develop a new mentality and morality that speaks to all of God’s people.


Trackbacks & Pingbacks

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *